GC3 Accuracy Test - Carl’s Place Outdoor Review

The Foresight GC3 launch monitor has been a popular option for golfers looking for top-notch accuracy for years. And after our late summer 2023 field test, we can see exactly why.

Simply put: in our outdoor launch monitor accuracy tests, Foresight’s GC3 was the most accurate launch monitor we’ve tested. Those range tests included: 

Shop Launch Monitors

Getting Started With Our GC3 Accuracy Test

The GC3 was super easy to take out and use at the driving range. It’s small and portable, and the fact that the numbers show up right on the unit itself means you don’t even need to connect it to a mobile device to get your data.

Our goal at the range was to compare the carry distance from the launch monitor with the carry distance measured by a rangefinder in real life. Too many other factors play into calculating other data, so we stuck with the one we know we can measure pretty accurately.

As with the rest of our driving range accuracy tests, we had Tim from our customer service team hit 20 shots with a driver, 6 iron and pitching wedge. Mike from the Carl’s Place marketing team was out chasing down and marking the balls, and then Tim would use the rangefinder to shoot Mike to get the real life distance.

As always with outdoor tests, there were a range of factors that could have affected the data:

  • The weather is almost always going to play a factor. However, this test day was maybe the calmest and best weather day of any that we’ve had for testing.
  • Our tee area is slightly elevated compared to the rest of the range.
  • Plus, Mike sometimes runs out of gas chasing down the balls and might miss marking a ball by a couple yards.

 

GC3 Accuracy Test Results

DRIVER DATA

Driver is a tough club for launch monitors to read because of the high club and ball speeds, but the GC3 didn’t seem to have much of a problem.

There were just two shots that were more than 10 yards off, but the other 18 shots were all within 8 yards of the real life distance.

The driver data was off an average of just 4.4 yards, which came out to be just over 2%. That’s really accurate, especially when compared to our other tests. 

Shot

Real Life Carry Distance

Simulator Carry Distance

Yardage Difference

Percentage Difference

Shot 1

239

237

2

0.84%

Shot 2

235

231

4

1.70%

Shot 3

243

243

0

0.00%

Shot 4

228

227

1

0.44%

Shot 5

224

220

4

1.79%

Shot 6

218

215

3

1.38%

Shot 7

227

227

0

0.00%

Shot 8

240

242

2

0.83%

Shot 9

222

215

7

3.15%

Shot 10

219

214

5

2.28%

Shot 11 

235

235

0

0.00%

Shot 12

218

200

18

8.26%

Shot 13

215

210

5

2.33%

Shot 14

223

236

13

5.83%

Shot 15

232

232

0

0.00%

Shot 16

224

224

0

0.00%

Shot 17

192

197

5

2.60%

Shot 18

229

225

4

1.75%

Shot 19

230

223

7

3.04%

Shot 20

183

175

8

4.37%

   

Average

4.4

2.03%

6 IRON DATA

All you need to do is look at the first 9 shots from the 6 iron. They were off by just 9 yards - COMBINED. That’s unbelievable.

We started seeing a little more fluctuation in the data after those 9 shots, but overall, it was still extremely accurate, averaging just 2.3 yards, or 1.29%, off from real life numbers.

Shot

Real Life Carry Distance

Simulator Carry Distance

Yardage Difference

Percentage Difference

Shot 1

160

160

0

0.00%

Shot 2

179

180

1

0.56%

Shot 3

183

184

1

0.55%

Shot 4

171

170

1

0.58%

Shot 5

186

185

1

0.54%

Shot 6

174

172

2

1.15%

Shot 7

168

165

3

1.79%

Shot 8

177

177

0

0.00%

Shot 9

179

179

0

0.00%

Shot 10

182

177

5

2.75%

Shot 11 

180

180

0

0.00%

Shot 12

176

172

4

2.27%

Shot 13

188

182

6

3.19%

Shot 14

181

181

0

0.00%

Shot 15

174

170

4

2.30%

Shot 16

168

170

2

1.19%

Shot 17

188

188

0

0.00%

Shot 18

180

174

6

3.33%

Shot 19

180

173

7

3.89%

Shot 20

179

182

3

1.68%

   

Average

2.3

1.29%

PITCHING WEDGE DATA

Unlike the start to the 6 iron data, the pitching wedge had an odd first shot with 10 yards of difference.

But from then on, it was fantastic. It was exact for five straight shots!

Overall, just 1.75 yards of difference, which was 1.44%. Pretty phenomenal. 

Shot

Real Life Carry Distance

Simulator Carry Distance

Yardage Difference

Percentage Difference

Shot 1

128

138

10

7.81%

Shot 2

118

118

0

0.00%

Shot 3

132

128

4

3.03%

Shot 4

125

122

3

2.40%

Shot 5

117

114

3

2.56%

Shot 6

124

124

0

0.00%

Shot 7

129

128

1

0.78%

Shot 8

117

115

2

1.71%

Shot 9

117

117

0

0.00%

Shot 10

124

124

0

0.00%

Shot 11 

127

127

0

0.00%

Shot 12

119

119

0

0.00%

Shot 13

126

126

0

0.00%

Shot 14

122

121

1

0.82%

Shot 15

114

114

0

0.00%

Shot 16

121

122

1

0.83%

Shot 17

123

120

3

2.44%

Shot 18

102

100

2

1.96%

Shot 19

112

116

4

3.57%

Shot 20

122

121

1

0.82%

   

Average

1.75

1.44%

Conclusion

So, knowing the Foresight GC3 price, what do we think? Is it worth that cost?

If we’re speaking strictly on accuracy, heck yes it is. When you hear the Foresight name, you expect greatness. Well, the GC3 launch monitor might have surpassed that. Plus, you can add in the bonus features of how portable the unit is and how you can see your numbers directly on the unit without having to connect a mobile device.

The Foresight GC3 might not be the least expensive launch monitor, but it has proven to be the most accurate. 

Shop Foresight GC3

Search articles by tag: